[Python-Dev] Python Language Summit at PyCon: Agenda (original) (raw)
Jesse Noller jnoller at gmail.com
Thu Feb 28 12:21:59 CET 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Python Language Summit at PyCon: Agenda
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Python Language Summit at PyCon: Agenda
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Feb 27, 2013, at 3:20 PM, anatoly techtonik <techtonik at gmail.com> wrote:
* security by obscurity in legal position of PSF towards contributors https://code.google.com/legal/individual-cla-v1.0.html vs http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/contrib-form/ + http://www.samurajdata.se/opensource/mirror/licenses/afl-2.1.php or http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/contrib-form/ + http://opensource.org/licenses/apache2.0.php and why PSF doesn't comply the 4. Redistribution clause from Apache 2.0 license
I'm not even touching your security through obscurity trollbait, but I'd like to know how the PSF / Python core is non compliant with clause 4, and the legal counsel you spoke to to confirm this.
Jesse -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20130228/6ac36c70/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Python Language Summit at PyCon: Agenda
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Python Language Summit at PyCon: Agenda
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]