[Python-Dev] stat module in C -- what to do with stat.py? (original) (raw)
Christian Heimes christian at python.org
Thu Jun 20 20:16:23 CEST 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] stat module in C -- what to do with stat.py?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] stat module in C -- what to do with stat.py?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Am 20.06.2013 17:35, schrieb Benjamin Peterson:
2013/6/20 Charles-François Natali <cf.natali at gmail.com>:
2013/6/20 Thomas Wouters <thomas at python.org>:
If the .py file is going to be wrong or incomplete, why would we want to keep it -- or use it as fallback -- at all? If we're dead set on having a .py file instead of requiring it to be part of the interpreter (whichever that is, however it was built), it should be generated as part of the build process. Personally, I don't see the value in it; other implementations will need to do something special to use it anyway.
That's exactly my rationale for pushing for removal. +1 to nixing it.
I'm +0 for removal. The stat module contains merely constants, wrappers for macros and one simple functions.
Somebody just say the word.
Christian
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] stat module in C -- what to do with stat.py?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] stat module in C -- what to do with stat.py?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]