[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: Reject PEP 315. (original) (raw)
R. David Murray rdmurray at bitdance.com
Wed Jun 26 18🔞08 CEST 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] End of the mystery "@README.txt Mercurial bug"
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: Reject PEP 315.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013 17:39:07 +0200, lukasz.langa <python-checkins at python.org> wrote:
- Deferred; see + Rejected; see + http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2013-June/021610.html + + This PEP has been deferred since 2006; see http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/060718.html
Subsequent efforts to revive the PEP in April 2009 did not meet with success because no syntax emerged that could - compete with a while-True and an inner if-break. + compete with the following form: - A syntax was found for a basic do-while loop but it found - had little support because the condition was at the top: + while True: + + if not : + break + - do ... while : - + Users of the language are advised to use that form when a do-while + loop would have been appropriate.
Why delete the information about what was found wanting?
--David
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] End of the mystery "@README.txt Mercurial bug"
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: Reject PEP 315.
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]