[Python-Dev] IDLE in the stdlib (original) (raw)

Barry Warsaw barry at python.org
Thu Mar 21 00:47:29 CET 2013


On Mar 20, 2013, at 11:11 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:

On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:05:40 -0700 Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:

Yes, the status quo of Idle is not something we should allow to continue indefinitely, but decisions about its future development should be made by active maintainers that are already trusted to make changes to it (such as Terry and Roger), rather than those of us that don't use it, and aren't interested in maintaining it. Definitely. People shouldn't remain quiescently torpid about the idle status quo.

The release managers should have a say in the matter, since it does cause some amount of pain there.

-Barry



More information about the Python-Dev mailing list