[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Issue #19512: Add a new _PyDict_DelItemId() function, similar to (original) (raw)
Victor Stinner victor.stinner at gmail.com
Fri Nov 8 00:46:40 CET 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Issue #19512: Add a new _PyDict_DelItemId() function, similar to
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Issue #19512: Add a new _PyDict_DelItemId() function, similar to
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2013/11/8 Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com>:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/69071054b42f changeset: 86968:69071054b42f user: Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com> date: Wed Nov 06 18:58:22 2013 +0100 summary: Issue #19512: Add a new PyDictDelItemId() function, similar to PyDictDelItemString() but using an identifier for the key ... As a private API, this shouldn't be part of the stable ABI.
When I don't know if a function should be made public or not, I compare with other functions.
In Python 3.3, _PyDict_GetItemIdWithError(), _PyDict_GetItemId() and _PyDict_SetItemId() are part of the stable ABI if I read correctly dictobject.h. _PyObject_GetAttrId() is also part of the stable ABI. Was it a mistake, or did I misunderstand how stable functions are declared?
Victor
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Issue #19512: Add a new _PyDict_DelItemId() function, similar to
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Issue #19512: Add a new _PyDict_DelItemId() function, similar to
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]