[Python-Dev] cpython: Rename contextlib.ignored() to contextlib.ignore(). (original) (raw)

Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Sun Oct 13 14:50:07 CEST 2013

On 13 October 2013 22:34, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:

On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 16:57:09 +1000 Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:

For the record, this thread did prompt me to consider the new construct anew, but on reflection, I still consider it a reasonable addition to contextlib. It substantially improves the simple cases it is intended to help with, and, if anything, makes overly broad exception suppression more obviously dubious (because the name of the construct doesn't match the consequences for multi-line suites). Why? Anyone can still write "try ... except". The only sticking point for this construct is that it allows to save one or two lines in rather uncommon cases (because most of the time you should do something on an exception, not "ignore" it). The saving is not worth it. Basically instead of: try: # something except FooException: pass You write: from contextlib import ignore with ignore(FooException): # something There's actually more typing involved, and one more API to know about... It is just another case of those "one-liners" that we generally refrain from adding to the stdlib.

It meets my threshold for inclusion (albeit only just). Your objection has been noted. I still do not agree. Now, can you please just let the matter drop?

That's the way this works (unless you think this is such a disastrous addition that you want to appeal to Guido to strip me of my responsibilities as contextlib maintainer and go hunting for a new one).

Regards, Nick.

-- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list