[Python-Dev] Regarding stdlib socket module, _fileobject.flush() method using ._rbufsize instead of ._wbufsize (original) (raw)
Antoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Thu Oct 17 12:23:31 CEST 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Regarding stdlib socket module, _fileobject.flush() method using ._rbufsize instead of ._wbufsize
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Regarding stdlib socket module, _fileobject.flush() method using ._rbufsize instead of ._wbufsize
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 21:30:52 -0400 Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote:
On 10/16/2013 5:01 PM, Peter Portante wrote: > Hello, > > Is there a reason why the stdlib socket module fileobject.flush() > method is using .rbufsize instead of .wbufsize at line 297 (Python > 2.7.3), where it determines the buffersize value to be used for > sock.sendall()? Does anybody know the history behind this?
Annotations and history show that line is from 61875, 2010-5-23, J P Calderone, Merged revisions 74426... I do not understand the message.
When mentioning Mercurial changesets, please post the (hexadecimal) changeset id, not the revision number, since revision numbers are not stable accross clones. http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/RevisionNumber
Regards
Antoine.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Regarding stdlib socket module, _fileobject.flush() method using ._rbufsize instead of ._wbufsize
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Regarding stdlib socket module, _fileobject.flush() method using ._rbufsize instead of ._wbufsize
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]