[Python-Dev] PEP 451: ModuleSpec (original) (raw)

Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Sun Oct 20 18:57:23 CEST 2013

How about if Brett and Nick both agree that it's good, I approve it? If either one wants more discussion I'll appoint them the PEP-BDFL.

On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Eric Snow <ericsnowcurrently at gmail.com> wrote:

On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Eric Snow <ericsnowcurrently at gmail.com> wrote:

Any comments? Usually silence implies no disapproval. ;) PEP 451 did go through several rounds of review on import-sig, so I'm not going to stress over low feedback at this point. However, I'd particularly appreciate knowing if there are any objections to ModuleSpec for 3.4. Otherwise I'd like to get pronouncement on the PEP. Thanks! Okay, no objections and the PEP has not changed. I'd like pronouncement on PEP 451. Guido, if you feel so inclined as to delegate and either of them is willing, Brett and Nick are both familiar with the PEP, having been heavily involved in earlier discussions. Thanks! -eric

-- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list