[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Fiddled Thread.join() to be a little simpler. Kinda ; -) (original) (raw)
Tim Peters tim.peters at gmail.com
Sat Oct 26 17:42:27 CEST 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Fiddled Thread.join() to be a little simpler. Kinda ; -)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Fiddled Thread.join() to be a little simpler. Kinda ; -)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 6:29 AM, A.M. Kuchling <amk at amk.ca> wrote:
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 05:34:05AM +0200, tim.peters wrote:
Fiddled Thread.join() to be a little simpler. Kinda ;-) - # else it's a negative timeout - precise behavior isn't documented - # then, but historically .join() returned in this case + else: + # the behavior of a negative timeout isn't documented, but + # historically .join() has acted as if timeout=0 then I think the final 'then' on the new comment is an editing error. Unless perhaps you meant to write a further sentence of comment?
Reads OK to me. Read "then" as an abbreviation of "in that case"?
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Fiddled Thread.join() to be a little simpler. Kinda ; -)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Fiddled Thread.join() to be a little simpler. Kinda ; -)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]