[Python-Dev] PEP 453 Round 4 (original) (raw)

[Python-Dev] PEP 453 Round 4 - Explicit bootstrapping of pip in Python installations

Donald Stufft donald at stufft.io
Thu Sep 19 15:52:01 CEST 2013


On Sep 19, 2013, at 9:43 AM, Paul Moore <p.f.moore at gmail.com> wrote:

On 19 September 2013 14:27, Donald Stufft <donald at stufft.io> wrote:

Major changes:

* Removal of the option to fetch pip from PyPI in order not to modify the trust model of the Python installers * Consequently rename the model from getpip to extractpip If extractpip (I agree, I don't like the name, installpip is better) only ever unpacks the bundled pip, and it's always run, why bother? Why not just bundle pip directly into site-packages? The extra step seems to add little or no value. Paul

Well it's not always run (the PEP has it as an option in the installers that is checked by default) but even if it were always installed:


Donald Stufft PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA

-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 801 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20130919/b8d08673/attachment.sig>



More information about the Python-Dev mailing list