[Python-Dev] Use an empty def as a lambda (original) (raw)

Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Thu Sep 19 23:17:58 CEST 2013


On 20 Sep 2013 07:04, "Joe Pinsonault" <joe.pinsonault at gmail.com> wrote:

I think it's a great idea personally. It's explicit and obvious. "lamda" is too computer sciencey

This suggestion has been made many times, occasionally with the associated "must be contained in parentheses when used as an expression" caveat that is needed to avoid making the language grammar ambiguous at the statement level.

It mainly runs afoul of two problems:

Cheers, Nick.

On Sep 19, 2013 1:55 PM, "Ben Gift" <benhgift at gmail.com> wrote:

I think the lambda keyword is difficult to understand for many people. It would be more pythonic to use an empty def call instead. For instance this: words.sort(key = lambda x: x[2]) could look like this: words.sort(key = def (x): x[2]) It's obvious and explicit that we're creating an unnamed, anonymous function this way.


Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev at python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/joe.pinsonault%40gmail.com


Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev at python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ncoghlan%40gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20130920/290c0ca3/attachment.html>



More information about the Python-Dev mailing list