[Python-Dev] PEP 453 (pip bootstrapping) ready for pronouncement? (original) (raw)
Donald Stufft donald at stufft.io
Tue Sep 24 06:35:05 CEST 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 453 (pip bootstrapping) ready for pronouncement?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 453 (pip bootstrapping) ready for pronouncement?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sep 24, 2013, at 12:32 AM, Ned Deily <nad at acm.org> wrote:
IANAL, but I think it would be good if, at least, the setuptools license were clearer and the LGPL reference for the cert bundle was changed. It might be a good idea to get an opinion from Van Lindberg. But I'm happy to defer to Martin's judgement on this.
After your concern was raised I went ahead and emailed VanL.
Donald Stufft PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA
-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 801 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20130924/5ca2f486/attachment.sig>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 453 (pip bootstrapping) ready for pronouncement?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 453 (pip bootstrapping) ready for pronouncement?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]