[Python-Dev] Revert #12085 fix for del attribute error message (original) (raw)
Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Tue Sep 24 09:32:15 CEST 2013
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Revert #12085 fix for __del__ attribute error message
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Revert #12085 fix for __del__ attribute error message
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 24 September 2013 17:25, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
Preferring the status quo because you're holding out a forlorn hope for a concise wording that explains:
- there are places where exceptions may occur but the interpreter can't reraise them - this is one of those cases, so we're printing it to stderr instead without users needing to do any research.
Oops, reworded the second part of that sentence without fixing the first part. It should have said:
============== It doesn't make sense to prefer the status quo because you're holding out a forlorn hope for a concise wording that explains:
- there are places where exceptions may occur but the interpreter can't reraise them
- this is one of those cases, so we're printing it to stderr instead
without users needing to do any research.
Regards, Nick.
-- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Revert #12085 fix for __del__ attribute error message
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Revert #12085 fix for __del__ attribute error message
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]