[Python-Dev] asdl.py and Python-ast.[hc] (original) (raw)

Eli Bendersky eliben at gmail.com
Thu Sep 26 22:49:58 CEST 2013

On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:

On Thu, 26 Sep 2013 11:46:07 -0700 Eli Bendersky <eliben at gmail.com> wrote:

> > >> 2013/9/26 Eli Bendersky <eliben at gmail.com>: > > >> > Hi All, > > >> > > > >> > Earlier this morning I had a slight tackle with a couple of the 3.4 > > bots > > >> > (sorry everyone!). I fixed some problems in asdl.py - > > >> > http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/21d46e3ae60c - and used the 'with' > > >> > statement. Some bots don't have Python 2.6+ and couldn't bootstrap > > >> > Python-ast.h/c > > >> > > > >> > Two questions: > > >> > > > >> > * Should I always check-in Python-ast.h and Python-ast.c when I touch > > >> > asdl* > > >> > ? The generated files are unchanged, it's only the timestamp that > > >> > changed. > > >> > * Can we, in theory, use new Pythons for asdl* code, because > > >> > Python-ast.* > > >> > are, in fact, checked in so they don't have to be rebuilt by the bots > > or > > >> > users? > > >> > > >> We should have the buildbots run "make touch", so they don't need to > > >> run asdlc.py. > > > > > > > > > How should we go about doing this? > > > > Complain to Antoine I suppose. :) > > > [+ Antoine] > Done :) "make touch"? Wow, I'm learning new stuff everyday :-) (what point is there in adding things to Makefile if nobody knows about them?)

The devguide would be a good place to mention this. http://bugs.python.org/issue15964 tracked the task for a while, but I'm not sure what the status is.

Eli -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20130926/cfe9adcb/attachment.html>

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list