[Python-Dev] sum(...) limitation (original) (raw)
Glenn Linderman v+python at g.nevcal.com
Sun Aug 10 22:12:26 CEST 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] sum(...) limitation
- Next message: [Python-Dev] sum(...) limitation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 8/10/2014 1:24 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Actually ... if I were a fan of the "".join() idiom, I'd seriously propose 0.sum(numericiterable) as the RightThang{tm]. Then we could deprecate "".join(stringiterable) in favor of "".sum(stringiterable) (with the same efficient semantics). Actually, there is no need to wait for 0.sum() to propose "".sum... but it is only a spelling change, so no real benefit.
Thinking about this more, maybe it should be a class function, so that it wouldn't require an instance:
str.sum( iterable_containing_strings )
[ or str.join( iterable_containing_strings ) ] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140810/1e125cec/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] sum(...) limitation
- Next message: [Python-Dev] sum(...) limitation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]