[Python-Dev] PEP 4000 to explicitly declare we won't be doing a Py3k style compatibility break again? (original) (raw)
Łukasz Langa lukasz at langa.pl
Sun Aug 17 04:49:18 CEST 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 4000 to explicitly declare we won't be doing a Py3k style compatibility break again?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 4000 to explicitly declare we won't be doing a Py3k style compatibility break again?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Aug 16, 2014, at 7:43 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
But can we really say there won't be a 4.0? Never? Why not? Who is to say that at some point some folks won't be going off on their own to design a whole new language and name it Python 4, following Larry Wall's Perl 6 example?
If they ever do, please make them not follow the Perl 6 example!
-- Best regards, Łukasz Langa
WWW: http://lukasz.langa.pl/ Twitter: @llanga IRC: ambv on #python-dev -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140816/2da0325a/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 4000 to explicitly declare we won't be doing a Py3k style compatibility break again?
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 4000 to explicitly declare we won't be doing a Py3k style compatibility break again?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]