[Python-Dev] PEP 467: Minor API improvements for bytes & bytearray (original) (raw)
Barry Warsaw barry at python.org
Mon Aug 18 15:50:00 CEST 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 467: Minor API improvements for bytes & bytearray
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 467: Minor API improvements for bytes & bytearray
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Aug 17, 2014, at 09:39 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
need for a special case for a single byte. We already have a perfectly good spelling: NUL = bytes([0]) That is actually a very cumbersome spelling. Why should I first create a one-element list in order to create a one-byte bytes object?
I feel the same way every time I have to write set(['foo']).
-Barry
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 467: Minor API improvements for bytes & bytearray
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 467: Minor API improvements for bytes & bytearray
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]