[Python-Dev] PEP 481 - Migrate Some Supporting Repositories to Git and Github (original) (raw)
Pierre-Yves David pierre-yves.david at ens-lyon.org
Tue Dec 2 23:59:01 CET 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 481 - Migrate Some Supporting Repositories to Git and Github
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 481 - Migrate Some Supporting Repositories to Git and Github
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 12/02/2014 02:47 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
On Dec 2, 2014, at 5:42 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org_ _<mailto:guido at python.org>> wrote:
Before anyone gets too excited about Rietveld (which I originally wrote as an APp Engine demo), AFAIK we're using a fork that only Martin von Loewis can maintain -- and it's a dead-end fork because the Rietveld project itself only supports App Engine, but Martin's fork runs on our own server infrastructure. These environments are very different (App Engine has its own unique noSQL API) and it took a major hack (not by MvL) to get it to work outside App Engine. That fork is not supported, and hence our Rietveld installation still has various bugs that have long been squashed in the main Rietveld repo. (And no, I don't have time to help with this -- my recommendation is to move off Rietveld to something supported.) It probably makes sense to include code reviews in the matrix of what tools we’re going to use then yea? Like Github/Bitbucket/etc have review built in. Other tools like Phabricator do as well but are self hosted instead.
I think the people/company behind phabricator are planning to offer an hosting solution. Could be worth poking at them to have and idea of what is the status of it.
-- Pierre-Yves David
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 481 - Migrate Some Supporting Repositories to Git and Github
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 481 - Migrate Some Supporting Repositories to Git and Github
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]