[Python-Dev] .clinic.c vs .c.clinic (original) (raw)
Eric V. Smith eric at trueblade.com
Sat Jan 18 17:30:21 CET 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] .clinic.c vs .c.clinic
- Next message: [Python-Dev] .clinic.c vs .c.clinic
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 1/18/2014 11:24 AM, Stefan Krah wrote:
Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka at gmail.com> wrote:
Now generated files have suffixes .clinic.c. I think it will be better, if they will end at special suffix (.c.clinic or even just .clinic). Can the output not go into a header file with static inline functions? I'd rather see memoryview.h than memoryview.clinic.c.
Same here. There's some history for this, but not for generated code. In Objects/stringlib, all of the files are .h files. They're really C code designed to be included by other .c files.
Eric.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] .clinic.c vs .c.clinic
- Next message: [Python-Dev] .clinic.c vs .c.clinic
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]