[Python-Dev] Negative times behaviour in itertools.repeat for Python maintenance releases (2.7, 3.3 and maybe 3.4) (original) (raw)
Antoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Mon Jan 27 10:39:55 CET 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Negative times behaviour in itertools.repeat for Python maintenance releases (2.7, 3.3 and maybe 3.4)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Negative times behaviour in itertools.repeat for Python maintenance releases (2.7, 3.3 and maybe 3.4)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 21:01:08 -0800 Larry Hastings <larry at hastings.org> wrote:
On 01/26/2014 08:40 PM, Alexander Belopolsky wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Vajrasky Kok > <sky.kok at speaklikeaking.com <mailto:sky.kok at speaklikeaking.com>> wrote: > > In case we are taking "not backporting anything at all" road, what is > the best fix for the document? > > > I would say no fix is needed for this doc because the signature > suggests (correctly) that passing times by keyword is not supported.
Where does it do that?
In the "[,times]" spelling, which is the spelling customarily used for positional-only arguments.
Regards
Antoine.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Negative times behaviour in itertools.repeat for Python maintenance releases (2.7, 3.3 and maybe 3.4)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Negative times behaviour in itertools.repeat for Python maintenance releases (2.7, 3.3 and maybe 3.4)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]