[Python-Dev] Internal representation of strings and Micropython (original) (raw)
Jeff Allen ja.py at farowl.co.uk
Wed Jun 4 09:41:12 CEST 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Internal representation of strings and Micropython
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Internal representation of strings and Micropython
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jython uses UTF-16 internally -- probably the only sensible choice in a Python that can call Java. Indexing is O(N), fundamentally. By "fundamentally", I mean for those strings that have not yet noticed that they contain no supplementary (>0xffff) characters.
I've toyed with making this O(1) universally. Like Steven, I understand this to be a freedom afforded to implementers, rather than an issue of conformity.
Jeff Allen
On 04/06/2014 02:17, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
There is a discussion over at MicroPython about the internal representation of Unicode strings. ... My own feeling is that O(1) string indexing operations are a quality of implementation issue, not a deal breaker to call it a Python. I can't see any requirement in the docs that str[n] must take O(1) time, but perhaps I have missed something.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Internal representation of strings and Micropython
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Internal representation of strings and Micropython
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]