[Python-Dev] [numpy wishlist] Interpreter support for temporary elision in third-party classes (original) (raw)
Nathaniel Smith njs at pobox.com
Fri Jun 6 18:55:04 CEST 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [numpy wishlist] Interpreter support for temporary elision in third-party classes
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [numpy wishlist] Interpreter support for temporary elision in third-party classes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 6 Jun 2014 17:07, "Sturla Molden" <sturla.molden at gmail.com> wrote:
We would in total need two mutexes, one condition variable, a pthread, and a heap.
The proposal in my initial email requires zero pthreads, and is substantially more effective. (Your proposal reduces only the alloc overhead for large arrays; mine reduces both alloc and memory access overhead for boyh large and small arrays.)
-n -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140606/bfa95a9c/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [numpy wishlist] Interpreter support for temporary elision in third-party classes
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [numpy wishlist] Interpreter support for temporary elision in third-party classes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]