[Python-Dev] [numpy wishlist] Interpreter support for temporary elision in third-party classes (original) (raw)
Sturla Molden sturla.molden at gmail.com
Sat Jun 7 03:40:34 CEST 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [numpy wishlist] Interpreter support for temporary elision in third-party classes
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [numpy wishlist] Interpreter support for temporary elision in third-party classes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
Julian Taylor wrote:
tpcanelide receives two objects and returns one of three values: * can work inplace, operation is associative * can work inplace but not associative * cannot work inplace Does it really need to be that complicated? Isn't it sufficient just to ask the object potentially being overwritten whether it's okay to overwrite it?
How can it know this without help from the interpreter?
Sturla
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [numpy wishlist] Interpreter support for temporary elision in third-party classes
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [numpy wishlist] Interpreter support for temporary elision in third-party classes
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]