[Python-Dev] PEP 471 -- os.scandir() function -- a better and faster directory iterator (original) (raw)
Ryan rymg19 at gmail.com
Fri Jun 27 03:01:18 CEST 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 471 -- os.scandir() function -- a better and faster directory iterator
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 471 -- os.scandir() function -- a better and faster directory iterator
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
+1 for scandir. -1 for iterdir(scandir sounds fancier). -99999999 for windows_wildcard.
Tim Delaney <timothy.c.delaney at gmail.com> wrote:
On 27 June 2014 09:28, MRAB <python at mrabarnett.plus.com> wrote:
Personally, I'd prefer the name 'iterdir' because it emphasises that it's an iterator. Exactly what I was going to post (with the added note that thee's an obvious symmetry with listdir). +1 for iterdir rather than scandir Other than that: +1 for adding scandir to the stdlib -1 for windowswildcard (it would be an attractive nuisance to write windows-only code) Tim Delaney ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev at python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/rymg19%40gmail.com
-- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140626/d79bd792/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 471 -- os.scandir() function -- a better and faster directory iterator
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 471 -- os.scandir() function -- a better and faster directory iterator
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]