[Python-Dev] unicode_string future, str -> basestring, fix or feature (original) (raw)
Chris Barker chris.barker at noaa.gov
Mon Mar 3 17:37:15 CET 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] unicode_string future, str -> basestring, fix or feature
- Next message: [Python-Dev] unicode_string future, str -> basestring, fix or feature
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
AFACT, in that message Victor was only talking about allowing Unicode filenames. ...
Finally, in most places Python 2.7 does handle Unicode filenames just fine.
I'm a bit confused. In this example:
http://bugs.python.org/issue18695
You are proposing that the issue should be considered a bug and a well-written patch accepted?
Or is is just too late for 2.7 ?
Personally I think that having some, but not all file functions accept unicode paths is pretty broken....and fixing these kinds of thing will ease 2 to 3 transition, so a good thing overall.
- Chris
--
Christopher Barker, Ph.D. Oceanographer
Emergency Response Division NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice 7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception
Chris.Barker at noaa.gov -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140303/c95108eb/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] unicode_string future, str -> basestring, fix or feature
- Next message: [Python-Dev] unicode_string future, str -> basestring, fix or feature
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]