[Python-Dev] Making proxy types easier to write and maintain (original) (raw)
Paul Moore p.f.moore at gmail.com
Wed Mar 19 21:15:15 CET 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Making proxy types easier to write and maintain
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Making proxy types easier to write and maintain
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 19 March 2014 18:46, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:
In http://bugs.python.org/issue19359#msg213530 I proposed to introduce a "proxy protocol" (proxy / tpproxy) that would be used as a fallback by PyObjectLookupSpecial to fetch the lookup target, i.e.:
def PyObjectLookupSpecial(obj, name): tp = type(obj) try: return getattr(tp, name) except AttributeError: return getattr(tp.tpproxy(), name) What do you think?
Would that increase the size of type objects? Would that matter? (There's a similar question that came up in the thread about adding the @ operator over on python-ideas, which is what made me think of it...) Paul
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] Making proxy types easier to write and maintain
- Next message: [Python-Dev] Making proxy types easier to write and maintain
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]