[Python-Dev] PEP 466: Proposed policy change for handling network security enhancements (original) (raw)
Antoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Sun Mar 23 00:33:07 CET 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 466: Proposed policy change for handling network security enhancements
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 466: Proposed policy change for handling network security enhancements
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 19:07:51 -0400 Donald Stufft <donald at stufft.io> wrote:
As someone who is deeply biased towards improving the packaging tool chain and getting people to use it I think that most people will simply use the Stdlib even if a more secure alternative exists. Infact one does exist and I still see almost everyone using the stdlib ssl instead of pyopenssl.
pyopenssl exposes a different API from ssl, though. It's not just a matter of flipping an import statement.
Regards
Antoine.
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 466: Proposed policy change for handling network security enhancements
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 466: Proposed policy change for handling network security enhancements
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]