[Python-Dev] collections.sortedtree (original) (raw)

Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Thu Mar 27 16:37:34 CET 2014

Surely you can show empathy and still explain why it's not that easy. On Mar 27, 2014 2:11 AM, "Maciej Fijalkowski" <fijall at gmail.com> wrote:

On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Paul Moore <p.f.moore at gmail.com> wrote: > On 27 March 2014 08:16, Maciej Fijalkowski <fijall at gmail.com> wrote: >> And random pieces of C included in the standard library can be >> shuffled under the carpet under the disguise of upgrade or what are >> you suggesting? > > The sort of thing that happens is that the relevant approvers will > accept python-dev as a "trusted supplier" and then Python upgrades are > acceptable subject to review of the changes, etc. For a new module, > there is a whole other level of questions around how do we trust the > person who developed the code, do we need to do a full code review, > etc? > > It's a bit unfair to describe the process as "random pieces of C" > being "shuffled under the carpet". (Although there probably are > environments where that is uncomfortably close to the truth :-() > > Paul

I just find "my company is stupid so let's work around it by putting stuff to python standard library" unacceptable argument for python-dev and all the python community. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140327/4f8be985/attachment.html>

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list