[Python-Dev] PEP 481 - Migrate Some Supporting Repositories to Git and Github (original) (raw)
Alex Gaynor alex.gaynor at gmail.com
Sun Nov 30 17:37:15 CET 2014
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 481 - Migrate Some Supporting Repositories to Git and Github
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 481 - Migrate Some Supporting Repositories to Git and Github
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun Nov 30 2014 at 10:28:50 AM Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
Why specifically? Did you have a web UI for reviewing patches previously? Do you have CI set up for patches now and didn't before? What features did you specifically gain from the switch to GitHub that you didn't have before? IOW was it the "magic" of GitHub or some technical solution that you got as part of the GitHub package and thus could theoretically be replicated on python.org?
-Brett
Previously someone looking for a review (read: any non-committer) would export a diff from their VCS, upload it as a patch to trac, and then reviewers could leave comments as trac comments. CPython's present process is a clear improvement, insofar as Rietveld allows inlining commenting, but it is otherwise basically the same.
By contrast, the Github process does not require a patch author to leave their workflow, they simply "git push" to update a patch. We now also have CI for PRs, but that's a recent addition.
It's not magic, it's a good UX :-)
Alex -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20141130/21a44475/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 481 - Migrate Some Supporting Repositories to Git and Github
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 481 - Migrate Some Supporting Repositories to Git and Github
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]