[Python-Dev] Type hints -- a mediocre programmer's reaction (original) (raw)
Isaac Morland ijmorlan at uwaterloo.ca
Mon Apr 20 21:37:57 CEST 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Type hints -- a mediocre programmer's reaction
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Type hints -- a mediocre programmer's reaction
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, Paul Moore wrote:
On 20 April 2015 at 19:41, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote:
tldr; type hints in python source are scary. Would reserving them for stub files be better?
I think so. I think PEP 8 should require stub files for stdlib modules and strongly encourage them for 3rd party code. Agreed. I have many of the same concerns as Harry, but I wouldn't have expressed them quite as well. I'm not too worried about actually removing annotations from the core language, but I agree that we should create a strong culture of "type hints go in stub files" to keep source files readable and clean. On that note, I'm not sure "stub" files is a particularly good name. Maybe "type files" would be better? Something that emphasises that they are the correct place to put type hints, not a workaround.
How about "header" files?
(ducks...)
Isaac Morland CSCF Web Guru DC 2619, x36650 WWW Software Specialist
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Type hints -- a mediocre programmer's reaction
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Type hints -- a mediocre programmer's reaction
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]