[Python-Dev] Type hints -- a mediocre programmer's reaction (original) (raw)
Harry Percival harry.percival at gmail.com
Tue Apr 21 00:34:51 CEST 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Type hints -- a mediocre programmer's reaction
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Type hints -- a mediocre programmer's reaction
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
exactly. yay stub files! we all agree! everyone loves them! boo type annotations inline in python source. only some people love them. and even then, only after a while, and only tentatively... and some people fear them, mightily...
On 20 April 2015 at 23:14, Łukasz Langa <lukasz at langa.pl> wrote:
On Apr 20, 2015, at 3:02 PM, Ian Cordasco <graffatcolmingov at gmail.com> wrote:
I think while the authors are currently seeing stubs as a necessary evil they're missing points where they're a better backwards compatible solution for people who want to give users with capable IDEs the ability to use stub (or hint) files. We might have not chosen the wording that makes this obvious to you but we definitely did consider all of the points you’re referring to: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0484/#stub-files -- Best regards, Łukasz Langa WWW: http://lukasz.langa.pl/ Twitter: @llanga IRC: ambv on #python-dev
--
Harry J.W. Percival
Twitter: @hjwp Mobile: +44 (0) 78877 02511 Skype: harry.percival -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150420/3b73b4b9/attachment-0001.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Type hints -- a mediocre programmer's reaction
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Type hints -- a mediocre programmer's reaction
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]