[Python-Dev] PEP 492: No new syntax is required (original) (raw)
Paul Sokolovsky pmiscml at gmail.com
Tue Apr 28 00:48:49 CEST 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492: No new syntax is required
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492: No new syntax is required
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hello,
On Sun, 26 Apr 2015 20:39:55 -0400 Yury Selivanov <yselivanov.ml at gmail.com> wrote:
[]
> As for 3rd point, I'd like to remind that CPython is only one Python > implementation. And with my MicroPython hat on, I'd like to know if > (some of) these new features are "bloat" or "worthy" for the space > constraints we have.
OT: MicroPython is an amazing project. Kudos for doing it. I really hope that addition of few new magic methods won't make it too hard for you guys to implement PEP 492 in MicroPython one day.
Thanks! Damien George, MicroPython's author, actually already made a basic implementation of async def/await: https://github.com/micropython/micropython/commit/81afa7e098634605c04597d34a51ca2e59a87d7c So we surely do hope this PEP will be accepted, and soonish! ;-)
-- Best regards, Paul mailto:pmiscml at gmail.com
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492: No new syntax is required
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492: No new syntax is required
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]