[Python-Dev] PEP 492 vs. PEP 3152, new round (original) (raw)
Greg Ewing greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Wed Apr 29 11:13:05 CEST 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492 vs. PEP 3152, new round
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492: No new syntax is required
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Yury Selivanov wrote:
It's just like unary minus ;)
I'm confused. I thought you were arguing that your grammar is better because it's not just like unary minus?
If being just like unary minus is okay, then why not just make it so?
-- Greg
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492 vs. PEP 3152, new round
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492: No new syntax is required
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]