[Python-Dev] PEP 492 vs. PEP 3152, new round (original) (raw)
andrew.svetlov at gmail.com andrew.svetlov at gmail.com
Wed Apr 29 18:45:07 CEST 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492 vs. PEP 3152, new round
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492 vs. PEP 3152, new round
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
— Sent from Mailbox
On Wednesday Apr 29, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Yury Selivanov <yselivanov.ml at gmail.com>, wrote:Also please see this:
https://hg.python.org/peps/rev/d048458307b7
FWIW, 'await await fut' isn't something that you likely to see in
your life; 'await -fut' is 99.999% just a bug. Agree.
I'm not sure
why Greg is pushing his Grammar idea so aggressively.
Yury
On 2015-04-29 11:33 AM, Yury Selivanov wrote:
Ethan,
On 2015-04-29 11:29 AM, Ethan Furman wrote:
Python is not lisp, and await is not a
function, so parens should not be needed in the common case.
Which common case you mean?
Please see this table
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0492/#syntax-of-await-expression
Yury
Python-Dev mailing list
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/andrew.svetlov%40gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150429/ef7b64cb/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492 vs. PEP 3152, new round
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492 vs. PEP 3152, new round
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]