[Python-Dev] PEP 492 vs. PEP 3152, new round (original) (raw)
Paul Moore p.f.moore at gmail.com
Wed Apr 29 20:44:53 CEST 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492 vs. PEP 3152, new round
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492 vs. PEP 3152, new round
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 29 April 2015 at 19:32, Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us> wrote:
On 04/29, Yury Selivanov wrote:
On 2015-04-29 1:25 PM, Ethan Furman wrote:
cannot also just work and be the same as the parenthesized version.
Because it does not make any sense. I obviously don't understand your position that "it does not make any sense" -- perhaps you could explain a bit? What I see is a suspension point that is waiting for the results of coro(), which will be negated (and returned/assigned/whatever). What part of that doesn't make sense?
Would that not be "-await coro()"? What "await -coro()" would mean is to call coro() (which would return something you can wait on), then apply - to that (then waiting on the result of that negation). But what does negating an awaitable object mean? Obviously you can define it to mean something, but you probably didn't.
Paul
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492 vs. PEP 3152, new round
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492 vs. PEP 3152, new round
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]