[Python-Dev] PEP 492: What is the real goal? (original) (raw)
Greg Ewing greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Thu Apr 30 08:35:50 CEST 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492: What is the real goal?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492: What is the real goal?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Yury Selivanov wrote:
Everybody is pulling me in a different direction :) Guido proposed to call them "native coroutines". Some people think that "async functions" is a better name. Greg loves his "cofunction" term.
Not the term, the idea. But PEP 492 is not based on that idea, so I don't advocate calling anything in PEP 492 a cofunction. My vote goes to "async function".
-- Greg
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492: What is the real goal?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492: What is the real goal?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]