[Python-Dev] PEP 492: What is the real goal? (original) (raw)
Antoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Thu Apr 30 21:40:36 CEST 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492: What is the real goal?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492: What is the real goal?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 12:32:02 -0700 Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
No, this is the name we've been using since PEP 342 and it's still the same concept.
The fact that all syntax uses the word "async" and not "coro" or "coroutine" hints that it should really not be called a coroutine (much less a "native coroutine", which both silly and a lie).
Why not "async function"?
Regards
Antoine.
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492: What is the real goal?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492: What is the real goal?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]