[Python-Dev] cpython (merge 3.4 -> default): Merge 3.4 (asyncio) (original) (raw)
Victor Stinner victor.stinner at gmail.com
Mon Feb 2 20:53:49 CET 2015
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] cpython (merge 3.4 -> default): Merge 3.4 (asyncio)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 475 accepted
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi,
The current workflow of asyncio is to first commit changes in the external tulip project, then copy files to Python 3.4; to finish with a merge from Python 3.4 into Python 3.5. To be complete, I also merge tulip into trollius, but that's unrelated to your question :-)
To simplify the workflow, the code is currently exactly the same in tulip, python 3.4 and python 3.5. It implies some tests on the Python version in the code like "if _PY34: ...".
I would prefer to stick to this workflow. The code is still heavily modified to fix issues.
The behaviour of generators in already tested in test_generators and test_exceptions.
Victor
2015-02-02 20:41 GMT+01:00 Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net>:
On Mon, 02 Feb 2015 17:38:10 +0000 victor.stinner <python-checkins at python.org> wrote:
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/42b376c8cf60 changeset: 94465:42b376c8cf60 parent: 94463:0b3bc51341aa parent: 94464:2cd6621a9fbc user: Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com> date: Mon Feb 02 18:36:59 2015 +0100 summary: Merge 3.4 (asyncio) IMO it would be nice to keep the original code in the default branch, since it helps exercise generators. Regards Antoine.
Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev at python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/victor.stinner%40gmail.com
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] cpython (merge 3.4 -> default): Merge 3.4 (asyncio)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 475 accepted
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]