[Python-Dev] Workflow PEP proposals are now closed (original) (raw)

Brett Cannon brett at python.org
Mon Feb 2 21:04:33 CET 2015


On Mon Feb 02 2015 at 2:40:21 PM Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote:

Hi, What does "closed" mean in this context?

No new PEPs on this topic will be taken under consideration, so submissions are now "closed" to new participants.

-Brett

Regards Antoine.

On Mon, 02 Feb 2015 14:35:47 +0000 Brett Cannon <bcannon at gmail.com> wrote: > The PEPs under consideration are PEPs 474 > <https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0474/> and 462 > <https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0462/> from Nick Coghlan to use > Kallithea and do self-hosting, and PEP 481 > <https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0481/> from Donald Stufft that > proposes using GitHub. > > At this point I expect final PEPs by PyCon US so I can try and make a > decision by May 1. Longer still is to hopefully have whatever solution we > choose in place right after Python 3.5 is released. > > And just a reminder to people, the lofty goal is to improve the overall > workflow for CPython itself such that our patch submission queue can > actually be cleared regularly. This not only benefits core devs by letting > us be more effective, but also contributors by making sure their hard work > gets addressed quickly and thus doesn't languish on the issue tracker for > very long. > > If we can't find a solution for fixing our CPython workflow I will then be > willing to entertain these PEPs narrowing their scopes and only focus on > ancillary repos like the devguide, etc. where the workflows are simple. > > I know the absolute worst case is nothing changes, but honestly I think the > worst case is Nick's work gets us off of Rietveld, the ancillary repos move > to GitHub, and we make the GitHub and Bitbucket mirrors of CPython official > ones for people to work from (bonus points if we get the issue tracker to > have push button patch pulling from GitHub; Bitbucket is already covered > thanks to our remote hg repo support). IOW I see nothing but a win for > contributors and core devs as well as everyone proposing solutions which is > a nice place to start from. =) >


Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev at python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ brett%40python.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150202/d2c79f52/attachment-0001.html>



More information about the Python-Dev mailing list