[Python-Dev] (no subject) (original) (raw)
Neil Girdhar mistersheik at gmail.com
Mon Feb 9 23:12:02 CET 2015
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] (no subject)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] (no subject)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Right,
Just to be clear though: **-args must follow any *-args and position arguments. So at worst, your example is:
f(x, y, *k, *b, c, **w, **d)
Best,
Neil
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015, at 16:32, Guido van Rossum wrote: > FWIW, I've encouraged Neil and others to complete this code as a > prerequisite for a code review (but I can't review it myself). I am > mildly > in favor of the PEP -- if the code works and looks maintainable I would > accept it. (A few things got changed in the PEP as a result of the work.) In a way, it's a simplification, since functions are now simply called with a sequence of "generalized arguments"; there's no privileged kwarg or vararg. Of course, I wonder how much of f(**w, x, y, *k, *b, **d, c) we would see... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150209/d239b060/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] (no subject)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] (no subject)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]