[Python-Dev] (no subject) (original) (raw)
Neil Girdhar mistersheik at gmail.com
Tue Feb 10 00:20:06 CET 2015
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] (no subject)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] (no subject)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
That wording is my fault. I'll update the PEP to remove the word "currently" after waiting a bit to see if there are any other problems.
Best,
Neil
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org> wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015, at 17:12, Neil Girdhar wrote: > Right, > > Just to be clear though: **-args must follow any *-args and position > arguments. So at worst, your example is: > > f(x, y, *k, *b, c, **w, **d) > > Best, Ah, I guess I was confused by this sentence in the PEP: " Function calls currently have the restriction that keyword arguments must follow positional arguments and ** unpackings must additionally follow * unpackings." That suggests that that rule is going to change. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150209/e70224da/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] (no subject)
- Next message: [Python-Dev] (no subject)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]