[Python-Dev] (no subject) (original) (raw)

Neil Girdhar mistersheik at gmail.com
Tue Feb 10 02:12:12 CET 2015

Just an FYI: http://www.reddit.com/r/Python/comments/2v8g26/python_350_alpha_1_has_been_released/

448 was mentioned here (by Python lay people — not developers).

On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 7:56 PM, Neil Girdhar <mistersheik at gmail.com> wrote:

The admonition is against syntax that currently exists.

On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote:

On Feb 09, 2015, at 07:46 PM, Neil Girdhar wrote:

>Also, regarding calling argument order, not any order is allowed. Regular >arguments must precede other kinds of arguments. Keyword arguments must >precede **-args. *-args must precede **-args. However, I agree with >Antoine that PEP 8 should be updated to suggest that *-args should precede >any keyword arguments. It is currently allowed to write f(x=2, *args), >which is equivalent to f(*args, x=2). But if we have to add a PEP 8 admonition against some syntax that's being newly added, why is this an improvement? I had some more snarky/funny comments to make, but I'll just say -1. The Rationale in the PEP doesn't sell me on it being an improvement to Python. Cheers, -Barry

Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev at python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/mistersheik%40gmail.com

-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150209/89d5914e/attachment.html>

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list