[Python-Dev] PEP 492 vs. PEP 3152, new round (original) (raw)
Greg Ewing greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Fri May 1 07:58:55 CEST 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492 vs. PEP 3152, new round
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Unicode literals in Python 2.7
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nathaniel Smith wrote:
If await acted like -, then this would be await (x ** 2) But with the proposed grammar, it's instead (await x) ** 2
Ah, I had missed that!
This is a good argument for Yuri's grammar. I withdraw my objection now.
-- Greg
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492 vs. PEP 3152, new round
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Unicode literals in Python 2.7
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]