[Python-Dev] PEP 492: What is the real goal? (original) (raw)
Guido van Rossum guido at python.org
Tue May 5 21:24:12 CEST 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492: What is the real goal?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492: What is the real goal?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Yury Selivanov <yselivanov.ml at gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Oscar,
I've updated the PEP with some fixes of the terminology: https://hg.python.org/peps/rev/f156b272f860 I still think that 'coroutine functions' and 'coroutines' is a better pair than 'async functions' and 'coroutines'.
Yes. This subtopic is now closed for further debate (please).
-- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150505/ef13a896/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492: What is the real goal?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 492: What is the real goal?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]