[Python-Dev] How shall we conduct the Python 3.5 beta and rc periods? (Please vote!) (original) (raw)
Ned Deily nad at acm.org
Tue May 12 21:13:14 CEST 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] How shall we conduct the Python 3.5 beta and rc periods? (Please vote!)
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] [python-committers] How shall we conduct the Python 3.5 beta and rc periods? (Please vote!)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
In article <55523ADB.4000508 at hastings.org>, Larry Hastings <larry at hastings.org> wrote:
On 05/12/2015 10:23 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: > Will this model be plausibly extensible to every release? For > instance, when a 3.5.1 rc is cut, will the 3.5 branch immediately > become 3.5.2, with a new 3.5.1 branch being opened on bitbucket? Yes, we could always do it that way, though in the past we haven't bothered. Development on previous versions slows down a great deal after x.y.1.
Well, we could. But that is hardly worth it as we don't do long-term maintenance of each maintenance release. In other words, from a python-dev perspective, 3.5.1 is dead the moment 3.5.2 goes out the door; we only maintain the most recent maintenance release of a major release cycle. So there is no need for a 3.5.x branch other than possibly during the typically very short rc cycle of a maintenance release and even then we usually see at most a couple of rc fixes and usually none, as expected.
-- Ned Deily, nad at acm.org
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] How shall we conduct the Python 3.5 beta and rc periods? (Please vote!)
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] [python-committers] How shall we conduct the Python 3.5 beta and rc periods? (Please vote!)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]