[Python-Dev] Accepting PEP 489 (Multi-phase extension module initialization) (original) (raw)
Nick Coghlan ncoghlan at gmail.com
Sat May 23 01:33:47 CEST 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Accepting PEP 489 (Multi-phase extension module initialization)
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Can we clean up the buildbots please?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 23 May 2015 07:45, "Eric Snow" <ericsnowcurrently at gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all, After extended discussion over the last several months on import-sig, the resulting proposal for multi-phase (PEP 451) extension module initialization has finalized. The resulting PEP provides a clean, straight-forward, and backward-compatible way to import extension modules using ModuleSpecs. With that in mind and given the improvement it provides, PEP 489 is now accepted. I want to thank Petr, Nick, and Stefan for the time, thought, and effort they put into the proposal (and implementation). It was a disappointment to me when, at the time, we couldn't find a good way to apply PEP 451 to builtins and extension modules. So thanks for easing my anxiety!
Ah, what a nice way to start my weekend :)
Thanks especially to Petr both for writing the PEP itself, and for taking the general ideas Stefan and I originally had and turning them into a real implementation.
Cheers, Nick.
-eric
Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev at python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ncoghlan%40gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20150523/a50647dc/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Accepting PEP 489 (Multi-phase extension module initialization)
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Can we clean up the buildbots please?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]