[Python-Dev] Second milestone of FAT Python (original) (raw)
Victor Stinner victor.stinner at gmail.com
Wed Nov 4 17:23:34 EST 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Second milestone of FAT Python
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Second milestone of FAT Python
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2015-11-04 21:14 GMT+01:00 Sven R. Kunze <srkunze at mail.de>:
Do you think there will be any change of merging this back into CPython?
If I understood correctly the first feedback on python-ideas, there were mostly positive, so I believe that it would be possible to merge the FAT mode into CPython. The changes required to implement the FAT mode are restricted to a few files and are small. But I would prefer to keep the whole "FAT mode" optional, to keep exactly the same performances than before for the "standard" mode.
I will write a PEP for that, but first I have to ensure that FAT Python works as expected (it's really faster), and that it's generic enough to be used by projects like Numba, Cython, pythran, etc. (but not JIT-based interpreters like PyPy or pyston which already have their own efficient guards.)
Victor
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Second milestone of FAT Python
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Second milestone of FAT Python
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]