[Python-Dev] Request for pronouncement on PEP 493 (HTTPS verification backport guidance) (original) (raw)
Cory Benfield cory at lukasa.co.uk
Wed Nov 25 04:12:29 EST 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Request for pronouncement on PEP 493 (HTTPS verification backport guidance)
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Request for pronouncement on PEP 493 (HTTPS verification backport guidance)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 24 Nov 2015, at 12:53, Christian Heimes <christian at python.org> wrote: Right, with Antoine and Alex out of scope and you, Victor and me working for Red Hat, the air is getting thin. Benjamin is familiar with the ssl module. Or we can follow Alex's advice and ask somebody from the PyCA group (Donald, Paul, lvh) or requests (Cory) to get some outside perspective.
I’m not a CPython core developer, so I think that excludes me.
For what it’s worth, I think that this is a good PEP, and I’m strongly in favour of it being approved in some form. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 801 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20151125/5b50a36e/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Request for pronouncement on PEP 493 (HTTPS verification backport guidance)
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Request for pronouncement on PEP 493 (HTTPS verification backport guidance)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]