[Python-Dev] Issue #25256: Add sys.debug_build? (original) (raw)
Victor Stinner victor.stinner at gmail.com
Fri Oct 2 11:46:05 CEST 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Issue #25256: Add sys.debug_build?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Issue #25256: Add sys.debug_build?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2015-10-02 9:37 GMT+02:00 Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com>:
Spell it as "sys.implementation.debugbuild" and I'm in favour.
Oh, in fact, I don't have no preference between sys.debug_flag and sys.implementation.debug_flag. If I understood correctly, Serhiy would prefer sys.implementation.debug_flag because he doesn't want to add yet another symbol to the sys namespace.
But Berker Peksag wrote:
"According to the sys.implementation documentation and PEP 421, we can
only add a private attribute without writing a PEP. But I find
sys.implementation._debug_build too long and from sys import implementation; implementation._debug_build(or from sys import implementation as i; i._debug_build) is also not easy to write. So
I'm +1 to sys.debug_build."
Should I write a PEP for a new field in sys.implementation?
Victor
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Issue #25256: Add sys.debug_build?
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Issue #25256: Add sys.debug_build?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]