[Python-Dev] PEP 506 secrets module (original) (raw)
Random832 random832 at fastmail.com
Sat Oct 17 12:54:51 EDT 2015
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 506 secrets module
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 506 secrets module
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brian Gladman <brg at gladman.plus.com> writes:
On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 03:26:46AM +1100, Steven D'Aprano wrote: I hence support your conclusion that the module should offer randbelow alone. I would oppose offering randomrange (or offering more than one of them) since this will pretty well guarantee that, sooner or later, someone will make a mistake in using the extra functionality and possibly deploy an insecure application as a result. Brian Gladman
Plus if someone really does want randrange, they can simply do this:
def randfrom(seq): return seq[randbelow(len(seq))]
def randrange(start, stop, step=None): randfrom(range(start, stop, step))
These are simple recipes that probably don't belong in the module.
- Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 506 secrets module
- Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] PEP 506 secrets module
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]